He built the video platform the way he now builds everything: by specification. The same method produced the company website, rebuilt from the ground up to replace an old WordPress install: about 145 pages, among them 35 city pages and 97 property galleries, in 44 commits since February. It produced the admin panel that lets him add a shoot, reorder a portfolio of about 3,200 images and redeploy the site with one button, through a daemon that keeps the web tier from ever holding a shell. It produced the analytics he put in when he took Google’s trackers off the site, and the dozen-odd scheduled jobs that back up, monitor and patch the server. He directs the work. An AI writes the code, against a specification he writes first.
Almost everything he runs, he hosts himself, on the theory that a business should own its infrastructure rather than rent it from a vendor who may pivot, raise prices or disappear. The server patches itself and will not reboot while a video is encoding.
The specification says what the system must do, what it must never do and how he will know it is correct, and it exists before anything is built. The work goes out in small, scoped pieces rather than one heroic request. What comes back is read, exercised and checked for where it strays, and nothing is accepted until it has been verified against a live system, with a dated backup and a documented way to roll back already in place. He is precise about what he is: a product architect, not a software engineer. What he brings is the business. Thirty-five years across newsrooms, publications, operations and accounting tell him which requirements are right, which trade-offs are acceptable, and when a thing is subtly wrong even though it technically runs.
He writes the same way. In January 2024 he was stopped in traffic when an F-250 traveling roughly 75 miles an hour hit his car from behind. The crash left him with severe spinal and nerve damage and a traumatic brain injury, with persistent post-concussive symptoms that have made speech and language steadily harder as time goes on. So for the essays in the Notebook, Claude, Anthropic’s AI, serves as his wordsmith. “The thoughts are 100 percent mine,” he says. “Claude is the wordsmith.” He goes over every draft painstakingly, prompting and changing it until the words say what he thinks. Nothing runs until he has reviewed and revised every line. The machines do the typing. He remains firmly in charge of the thinking.
In January 2026 he founded BLUFify Media, a two-person Arizona company that applied the intelligence community’s analytic tradecraft to everyday news. Ninety outlets were graded separately on bias and on factuality. Confidence language was tied to evidence thresholds under ICD 203, the standard analysts use for saying how sure they are. A second model checked the first for anything it had made up. At its peak the platform tracked 177 sources across 14 sectors and produced 1,864 briefings, three a day, on 23,645 lines of Python that he directed and did not write. It paused in May under bootstrap funding pressure, documented for relaunch, every file carrying a checksum. It never had a paying customer. He volunteers that before anyone asks, which is about what you would hope from a man who built a platform around calibrated confidence.